CIoJ Press releases

European Parliament student journalist video competition winners

Posted on by CIoJ in CIoJ Press releases | Leave a comment


RELEASE DATE: 11 April 2014

Journalism student Video Winners celebrate

Journalism Students Ben Hatton and Ellen Millard have won first prize in the European Student Video Competition with their short documentary Land of Opportunity.

The two Winchester University students will be joined by the other finalists for the European Parliament competition to mark the impact of 40 years of Great Britain in Europe at a party in Europe House in London on 25 May.

Land of Opportunity explored what it is like for immigrants coming to the UK ahead of the highly anticipated lifting of restrictions on Bulgarian and Romanians.

The judging panel of professional journalists and producers commented that Ben and Ellen had made a “good selection of immigrant workers with well told back stories.” They had also “provide a nice combination of press headlines with the vox pops” and “had bought the personal stories to life.”

Second prize was awarded to Nadine Forshaw whose work, Eastleigh, explored how politicians and the media can impact on the views of local mainly white residents. Judges were impressed with her well told story and her analysis of “prejudice around EU in an English town with limited multi cultural plurality”.

Students Helen Barker, Dan Brown and James Euinton won third prize with Coming to Boston. Judges said this had an interesting regional focus and pointed out that EU agricultural immigrants in Lincolnshire contribute to taxes and the video was “well set up visually, with an engaging down to earth voiceover”.

All the winners have been invited to Election Night at Europe House in Westminster, 25 May 2014 where the videos will be shown. Ellen and Ben will also attend an all expenses behind the scenes visit to Brussels later in the year.



  1. Students from across Britain had the opportunity to submit a three to five minute video capturing some aspect of the 40 years since the UK joined the European Union.
  1. The Judges were Press Association’s head of video content, Jim Grice; Professor Tim Crook, Professor of Broadcast Journalism at City of Birmingham University and a senior lecturer in media law at Goldsmiths; Anna Averkiou, media trainer and former producer and reporter with the BBC, TV-am, CNN and MBC; and, Michael Green, a BAFTA award nominee. They were looking for quality of content, technical ability and overall presentation, and, are perfectly placed to know if the modern students can cut the mustard in a real newsroom.


The dark side of political power and Press regulation

Posted on by CIoJ in CIoJ Press releases | Leave a comment


RELEASE DATE: 9 April 2014

CIoJ logo

The Chartered Institute of Journalists has called for an independent inquiry into allegations that advisors to the Culture Secretary tried to browbeat a Telegraph journalist investigating her expenses.

Marie Miller’s resignation this morning should not make the issue go away. It highlights the “utter hypocrisy” of politicians rejecting self-regulation of the press, while sitting in judgement on the expense claims of fellow MPs.

Institute President Paul Leighton said: “Throughout the arguments about Leveson’s proposals for a press regulated by statute, journalists were told that their fight to retain self-regulation of the media was akin to “wanting to mark their own homework” and the press should instead be regulated by law.

“Now we find Members of Parliament defending their own – in this case Culture Secretary Maria Miller – over their expense claims and watering down the findings of the independent body set up to oversee MPs expenses. Does she think that by resigning that she can wash her hands of the story?”

Earlier this year Kathryn Hudson, Parliament’s standards commissioner, said Culture Secretary Maria Miller should hand back £45,000 in over-claimed allowances for a house in south-west London. However MPs on the Commons standards committee overruled the commissioner and said Mrs Miller would have to repay just £5,800 and apologise for her “attitude” during the inquiry.

Leighton added: “It is a truly bad day for democracy when Special Advisers at Westminster apparently seek to suppress legitimate journalistic investigation by making not very subtle references to a Minister’s role in piloting controversial legislation about press regulation through the Commons.

“It is hard to believe that a Minister who had already endeavoured to undermine inquiries into her expense claims was not aware of what was being done on her behalf by her staff.

“This is a striking illustration of why neither politicians or Government should play any part in regulating the activities of the vast majority of responsible journalists. The Daily Telegraph asked fair and reasonable questions about the behaviour of a leading member of the Government and was met with obfuscation and what can only be interpreted as ‘veiled threats’.

“Only an independent inquiry will help allay public concern about this matter and ensure that this sort of behaviour does not become the norm.”



Notes for Editors:

Formed in 1884, the Chartered Institute of Journalists (CIoJ) is the world’s oldest established professional body for journalists, and a representative voice of media and communications professionals throughout the UK and the Commonwealth.



Council rapped for defying publicity code

Posted on by CIoJ in CIoJ Press releases | Leave a comment


RELEASE DATE: 8 April 2014

CIoJ logo

A North London local authority has been rapped on the knuckles by a Government department for continuing to publish its in-house newspaper fortnightly, following a complaint by the Chartered Institute of Journalists.

Brandon Lewis MP told Waltham Forest Council to stop publishing the Waltham Forest News twice a month, which it has been doing for years, in contravention of Government guidelines aimed at protecting local papers from unfair tax-payer funded competition.

Because many authorities ignored the guidelines, the Code has now been made law under the Local Audit and Accountability Bill which came into force on March 30 this year.

The Chartered Institute of Journalists has waged a six-year campaign against this and other councils’ policy of non-compliance with the code.

Waltham Forest resident and CIOJ member Janice Shillum Bhend has been spearheading the Institute’s campaign. She was recently told by the editor of the council’s Waltham Forest News that they would continue to publish fortnightly until they got a letter from the Government telling them to stick to quarterly publication as set out in the new law.

This prompted Ms Shillum Bhend to report the matter to the Department for Communities and Local Government, which resulted in the letter being issued.

She said: “I’m absolutely delighted that our campaign is about to force Waltham Forest council to toe the line at last and stop wasting residents’ money on publishing WFN fortnightly against Government guidelines.”

In a letter to Waltham Forest’s Councillor Christopher Robbins, Mr Lewis said: “It has been suggested that your council might not be complying with the Publicity Code. I can see no reason for any council not to comply – non-compliance would, I believe, invariably involve an unacceptable waste of taxpayers’ money and council resources. I would suggest therefore that you take steps to ensure that your council is in compete compliance with the provisions of the Code. ”



Note to editors:

A copy of Brandon Lewis’ letter is available here:



Website access policy is ‘an attack on democracy’

Posted on by CIoJ in CIoJ Press releases | Leave a comment


RELEASE DATE:  19 March 2014

CIoJ logo

Allowing the police to publish directly onto a newspaper’s website is an attack both on democracy and the media profession as a whole, says the Chartered Institute of Journalists.

Speaking after local police in Torquay were allowed to post directly onto the Herald Express website, Amanda Brodie, chairman of the CIOJ’s Professional Practices Board, described the practice as ‘wholly unacceptable.’

“It is not the job of newspapers to be a mouthpiece for the police or any other body – their job is to hold them to account, not cosy up to them in this way,” she said.

“Who is scrutinising and making the judgements over this content? It’s not an impartial, professional journalist acting as the eyes and ears of the public – it’s the chief of police. The first thing totalitarian states do to consolidate absolute power is seize control of the newspapers and TV stations. That is what’s happening here – by stealth, and under a parliamentary democracy.

She added: “This policy will undermine the trust people have in the impartiality of their local papers. No local authority or commercial organisation should be allowed such access to the pages of our newspapers – it opens the door to bias and manipulation of news content.

“Publisher David Montgomery has attempted to defend his decision by saying that he has to ‘provide a gateway for community institutions.’ But this is not the local WI report – it is a powerful state-funded organisation which at national level has breached public trust in many areas and has been subject to little redress.

“This headlong-rush to cut costs by championing user-generated copy is costing journalists their jobs and has long-term consequences for the future of both the media industry and democracy as a whole.”




Note to editors:

Formed in 1884, the Chartered Institute of Journalists (CIoJ) is the world’s oldest established professional body for journalists, and a representative voice of media and communications professionals throughout the UK and the Commonwealth.


The Chartered Institute of Journalists has a new President

Posted on by CIoJ in CIoJ News, CIoJ Press releases | Leave a comment


RELEASE DATE:  3 March 2014

Paul Leighton is the new President of the Chartered Institute of Journalists.


Paul trained as a reporter at the Birmingham Post, after graduating in Politics with Economics from the University of Nottingham.

But radio captured his heart after joining BBC Radio Derby as reporter in 1972 , and he ran BBC studios in Matlock and Chesterfield – covering Derbyshire County Council and its then maverick leader David Bookbinder.

Paul’s continued interest in news and politics saw him work as a stringer for Telegraph and the Guardian and as a political Columnist for the Derby Trader Group before joining BBC Radio 4 in 1979.

He went on to lecture and develop staff at the BBC Journalist Training Unit at Broadcasting House, London and after twenty years with the Corporation he left to join Chiltern Radio Group becoming News editor for commercial stations in Dunstable, Bedford, Milton Keynes and St Albans.

He rejoined BBC Radio2 in 1995 and worked there as newsreader until 2000 when took up appointment as Head of News for Mix96 Radio in Aylesbury and Swan FM in High Wycombe.

More recently he has been a lecturer and freelance journalist and broadcaster in the West Country and he lives in Bristol.

He has for many years been Chairman of the Institute’s Broadcasting Division and was previously President from 1990-91.

Welcoming his new post Paul said: “I will continue the fight by the CIoJ in defending journalists and journalism against politicians’ attempts to stifle press freedom and undermine serious investigative reporting.

“The Institute needs to re-double its efforts to raise its public profile and ensure that we are always consulted over legislation or regulations that threaten the profession.”

He is also committed to encourage a revival of people’s interest in professional bodies after watching the development of criminal proceedings against journalists.

The CIoJ has always held its members to the highest ethics and many journalists had no idea what was being carried out by some publishers at national level. This point was made by Lord Justice Leveson and seems to have been ignored by every politician who has been held up to scrutiny.

“For that reason and for people to have confidence in journalists I will be fighting for us to renew contacts with our grassroots membership, and ensure that we are not perceived to be – an entirely London-centric organisation.

And he added: “It goes without saying that we must continue to expand our membership, since, although we have always “punched above our weight”, with all the threats to public funding affecting the BBC and the ongoing fight with regulation, there is greater strength in numbers.”

Paul takes over from former President Charlie Harris who died of cancer earlier this year.



Formed in 1884, the Chartered Institute of Journalists (CIoJ) is the world’s oldest established professional body for journalists, and a representative voice of media and communications professionals throughout the UK and the Commonwealth. Website:

Miranda decision should be warning to all journalists

Posted on by CIoJ in CIoJ Press releases | Leave a comment


RELEASE DATE: 24 February 2014

CIoJ logo

Still in the shadows of the Leveson inquiry, journalists have been reminded, once again, that they are not above the law.

While it is right that journalists enjoy certain protections in law, they should exercise the utmost caution before they place others in vulnerable positions, say the Chartered Institute of Journalists.

This follows the ruling that the nine-hour detention at Heathrow Airport of an ex-Guardian journalist’s partner was lawful. David Miranda lives with reporter Glenn Greenwald who has written articles about state surveillance based on leaked documents.

Mr Miranda had taken a case to the High Court in London to claim his detention under anti-terrorism laws was unlawful and breached human rights. Judges felt it was a “proportionate measure in the circumstances” and in the interests of national security.

Dominic Cooper for the CIoJ said: “Journalists should not be using people as mules to carry material which they know may breach the law. The Institute would be the first to stand up for a journalist exposing wrong doing but this is not the way forward.

“Journalists are there to hold people to account. That becomes difficult when you encourage others to break the law on your behalf. Ours is an honourable profession and it is this type of behaviour that creates difficulties. It may encourage younger and less experienced journalists to adopt the view that breaking the law is entirely acceptable if you are working in our industry. A view that may well have led to the profession’s recent difficulties.”

Lord Justice Laws, sitting with Mr Justice Ouseley and Mr Justice Openshaw, made the ruling and said the police action was “not only legitimate, but very pressing.”

The 28-year-old Brazilian was in transit from Germany to Brazil when he was stopped at the airport, detained, questioned and searched by police. He was carrying computer files for Mr Greenwald at the time and had items, including his laptop, mobile phone, memory cards and DVDs, taken from him.

Mr Greenwald has notoriously written a series of stories about spying in the US and UK after receiving material from US whistleblower Edward Snowden, who currently has temporary asylum in Russia.



Formed in 1884, the Chartered Institute of Journalists (CIoJ) is the world’s oldest established professional body for journalists, and a representative voice of media and communications professionals throughout the UK and the Commonwealth. Website:



House of Lords chairman slams royal charter as ‘undemocratic’ and calls for full parliamentary debate

Posted on by CIoJ in CIoJ Press releases | Leave a comment


RELEASE DATE: 25 October 2013

THE chairman of an important House of Lords committee has today criticised the lack of debate over the royal charter to regulate the press, saying it has bypassed Parliament and is ‘undemocratic.’

Lord Inglewood, who chairs the Lords select committee on communications, has written to Culture Secretary Maria Miller to ask for a full debate in the Commons.

He adds: “Procedures being proposed appear to be ‘inconsistent with our parliamentary and democratic traditions. Given the constitutional importance of the freedom of the press, and the political topicality and controversy surrounding this subject, we do not feel anything less than a full debate on the final text is appropriate.”

Amanda Brodie, chairman of the Professional Practices Board of the Chartered Institute of Journalists, welcomed the news: “We are delighted that an important figure such as Lord Inglewood, has stepped in to this process.

“We now join with Lord Inglewood in calling for the proposed sealing of the royal charter on October 30 to be delayed to allow for a full Parliamentary debate to take place.

“We have been campaigning against statutory regulation of the press since it was first raised and have always been against the charter proposals, which are just a back-door method of regulation.

“To put vital press freedoms in the hands of a non-elected body which is not accountable to Parliament has always seemed to us a dangerous path to go down.”

She added: “The CIoJ has given evidence to the House of Lords on the importance of press freedom and we are pleased to see the Communications Committee is taking the matter seriously.”



Contact:  Amanda Brodie MCIJ

Chairman, Professional Practices Board,


Mobile: 0777 5992563


Formed in 1884, the Chartered Institute of Journalists (CIoJ) is the world’s oldest established professional body for journalists, and a representative voice of media and communications professionals throughout the UK and the Commonwealth. Website:

‘Death by a thousand cuts’ fear for local press

Posted on by CIoJ in CIoJ Press releases | Leave a comment


RELEASE DATE: 17 September 2013

‘Death by a thousand cuts’ fear for local press

CIoJ logo

New laws aimed at capping costs in defamation and privacy cases could leave local newspapers struggling to pay legal bills even if they win, says the Chartered Institute of Journalists.

Following a recommendation by Lord Justice Leveson, the Government is consulting on plans to introduce a cost-protection scheme which would see those of ‘modest’ means exempted from paying their opponent’s legal fees – even if they lose a court case.

Amanda Brodie, chairman of the CIoJ’s Professional Practices Board, said: “The prospect of a payout without the danger of having to pay costs even if they lose, will encourage many people to simply have a pop at their local papers, to see what they can get. This could spell ‘death by a thousand cuts’ for some of our papers, which are already struggling to survive in these harsh economic times.

“Taken together with a no-win-no-fee agreement, this means a litigant could potentially walk away from losing a defamation/privacy case, leaving the innocent newspaper to pick up a hefty legal bill. A large bill of this type, or a succession of smaller vexatious claims, could put some local papers out of business all together.

“Even if the cost-protection benefit is retrospectively withdrawn by the judge, as in the case of a vexatious claim, the paper will have already gone to considerable expense both in finances and staff time, in defending the issue. It is certain that a proportion of this outlay will not be recovered, and so each case will represent a drain on already meagre resources.

“Whilst we support the principle that justice should be affordable to all, Lord Justice Leveson is wrong to seek to extend the principle of costs protection to defamation and privacy cases. It is another example of how a seemingly well-intentioned law can have a detrimental spin-off effect on journalism.

“Yet again our vital local press has been over-looked in the head-long rush to litigation involving the media. “

If this proposal goes through, the CIoJ fears it will have a disproportionate effect on local newspapers, which were exonerated of any blame in the phone-hacking saga which led to the Leveson enquiry.


Note to Editors:

Formed in 1884, the Chartered Institute of Journalists (CIoJ) is the world’s oldest established professional body for journalists, and a representative voice of media and communications professionals throughout the UK and the Commonwealth.  Website:


Amanda Brodie MCIJ, Chairman, Professional Practices Board, Chartered Institute of Journalists (mobile: 0777 5992563 email:

CIoJ urges clarification on 9-hour detention

Posted on by CIoJ in CIoJ Press releases | Leave a comment


RELEASE DATE: 19 August 2013

CIoJ urges clarification on 9-hour detention

CIoJ logo

The Chartered Institute of Journalists has called on the security authorities to explain why they questioned a journalist’s partner for nine hours under anti-terror laws.

David Miranda, partner of Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald, was detained as he passed through Heathrow airport en route to the couple’s home in Rio de Janeiro.

So far, the authorities have refused to justify the action, issuing only bland, factual statements, but Downing Street said: ”It is for the police to decide when [the use of Schedule 7] is necessary and proportionate to use these powers.”

CIoJ president Charlie Harris said: “This comment is truly chilling, implying that the police are unaccountable to the public and Parliament, and are above challenge and complaint.

“There may be good reasons why Mr Miranda was detained without access to a lawyer for the full time allowed under the law, an extremely rare occurrence, although it is hard to imagine what they may be.

“But unless the authorities explain themselves, it is hard not to believe that this was a blatant, if ham-fisted, attempt to intimidate a journalist, and a newspaper, who has caused profound embarrassment to the UK and US governments.

“One of the police’s favourite shibboleths when fobbing off public concern about abuse of their powers, is ‘If you’ve got nothing to hide, you’ve got nothing to be afraid of’.

“If the police truly believe this, it must apply to them as well.”


CIoJ support for Paxman

Posted on by CIoJ in CIoJ Press releases | Leave a comment


RELEASE DATE: 15 August 2013

CIoJ support for Paxman

The Chartered Institute of Journalists has offered its full support to Jeremy Paxman in the growing controversy over his beard.

Paxman’s facial hair has been the subject of much comment, criticism and mockery since it first appeared in public on Tuesday’s Newsnight.

The Institute said that much of the comment has been insulting and sexist, some of it from female commentators who would (rightly) be scrambling to condemn male colleagues who made similar remarks about a female broadcaster’s hairstyle.

The Institute’s (bearded) president, Charlie Harris, said: “I know this is the silly season, but with all the hard news around ‘man grows beard’ hardly merits the acres of print and broadcast minutes it has received.

“While some of the coverage has been jokey, some has been downright nasty, usually from people who should know, and behave better.”

Harris admitted that the Institute was currently firmly in the hands of the Bearded Tendency, with himself, the Immediate Past President Norman Bartlett; the general secretary Dominic Cooper, and the editor of The Journal, Andy Smith, among others, all sporting beards.

He said: “We stand shoulder-to-shoulder with Mr Paxman at this very difficult time, and assure him of our full support in the onslaught of the silly criticism he is enduring.

“We hope he stands firm and keeps his beard, which is discreet, well-kempt and distinguished.”